XXXVI. WRITING IN THE CLASSROOM: ANALYSIS AND PEDAGOGICAL PROPOSAL
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
This research work focuses on the ethnography of the classroom. The objective
The main objective was to identify the difficulties in the production of texts of the students of
basic education, tenth grade, in an institution of the official sector of the Colombian Caribbean.
The results that are exposed come from the design and application of a diagnostic test
to a population of 180 students, from which a random sample of 10% was taken; the
students made writing production from a topic of controversial social interest.
For the above, it became necessary to take as theoretical foundations the concepts of
writing by Cassany (2008), Pérez (1998), Teberosky (2007), Echeverría (2003), Flavell
(1985/1993), Russell (1990), cited in Carlino (2013), Nuñez (2016) by Jiménez and
Dominguez (2000); cited by Salgado (2007), The analysis of the results was carried out through
of the grid that is presented in the Curricular Guidelines of the Spanish language (1998), which
which emphasizes three basic levels: Intratextual, Intertextual and Extratextual. In
In line with the above, students show difficulties in organizing
sentences (local and global coherence), the connection between them (cohesion); equally
form, do not take into account the proper use of connectors, spelling, lexical variety and
omission of punctuation marks. Researchers propose an alternative
pedagogy for the improvement of the problem and the quality of learning.
Download Statistics
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Writing, Research, Ethnography in the classroom, Proposal pedagogical.
Carlino, P. (2013). Escribir, leer y aprender en la universidad. (7ª. Ed.). Buenos Aires:
Argentina.
Correa, M., Castro, F., y Lira, H. (2002). Hacia una conceptualización de la metacognición
y sus ámbitos de desarrollo. Horizontes educacinales,7(7), 58-63.
Echeverría, R. (2003). Ontología del lenguaje. Bogotá: JC Sáez Editor
Flavell, J. (1985). Conitive Development. U.S.A.: Prentice – Hall.
Guardián, F. A. (2007). El paradigma cualitativo en la investigación socio- educativa. San
José, Costa Rica: PrintCenter.
Hernández Campoy; J. M. y Almeida M. (2005). Metodología de la investigación
sociolingüística. Editorial Comares.
Jiménez-Domínguez, B. (2000). Investigación cualitativa y psicología social crítica. Contra
la lógica binaria y la ilusión de la pureza. Investigación cualitativa en Salud.
Recuperado el 17 de octubre del 2007 de:
http://www.cge.udg.mx/revistaudg/rug17/3invesigacion.html
Martínez, M. (1997). La investigación cualitativa etnográfica en educación. Bogotá: Círculo.
MEN. (1998). Lineamientos Curriculares para Lengua Castellana. Editorial Magisterio.
Bogotá, Colombia.
Núñez, M. (2016). Producción de Textos y Cultural Investigativa: Procesos Metacognitivos
de la Escritura. Recuperado https://es.calameo.com/read/00459761107e09e84099d
Pérez, M. (1998). Lineamientos Curriculares. Bogotá. Ministerio de Educación.
Russell, D. (1990): «Writing Across the Curriculum in Historical Perspective: Toward a
Social Interpretation». College English Teberosky, Anna (2007). Escribir y
comunicarse en contexto científico y académicos, conocimientos y estrategias.
España.Graó