IV. THE TYPE OF EDUCATIONAL MOTIVATION OF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENTS DURING COVID-19
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
views: 40 |
downloads: 9
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
After the Mexican Government decreed a voluntary confinement caused by the
pandemic derived from the SARS-CoV-2 virus, the Mexican Educational System established
the distance education modality during the 2019-2020 and 2020-2021 school years, which
implied a challenge of adaptation for the students. Therefore, it was appropriate to identify
the determinants of the motivation of elementary school students to perform the learning
activities requested by the teacher during the voluntary confinement.
Using a descriptive, retrospective, non-experimental methodological design and a
quantitative approach, a newly designed Likert-type scale was applied to a sample of 233
students from the rural area of the State of Puebla, Mexico, and subjected to evidence of
validity through reliability analysis according to Cronbach's Alpha coefficient and
exploratory factor analysis, which resulted in the identification of four motivational
components: personal factors, social factors, informative rewards and control rewards.
Finding that the personal factors of intrinsic motivation was the component with the
greatest impact, it is possible to conclude that a) these factors determined the execution of
academic activities and b) it is pertinent to develop cross-cutting educational strategies
focused on self-esteem, self-concept, and expectation of success to ensure the personal
development of students.
Download Statistics
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Motivation, Intrinsic motivation, Extrinsic motivation, Learning, Elementary education student
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association,
& National Council on Measurement in Education. (2018). Estándares para pruebas
educativas y psicológicas (M. Lieve, Trans.). Washington, DC: American Educational
Research Association. (Original work published 2014)
Ato, Manuel, & López, Juan J., & Benavente, Ana (2013). Un sistema de clasificación
de los diseños de investigación en psicología. Anales de Psicología, 29(3),1038-1059. ISSN:
0212-9728. https://bit.ly/33dRuI3
Barrios, M., y Cosculluela, A. (2013). Fiabilidad. En J. Meneses (coord.),
Psicometría (pp. 75–140). UOC.
Celina, H., y Campo, A. (2005). Aproximación al uso del coeficiente alfa de
Cronbach. Revista colombiana de psiquiatría, XXXIV (4), 572–580. https://bit.ly/31IAN6E
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2010). Fluir (flow): una psicología de la felicidad. Editorial
Kairós.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2012). Research methods in Education (6th
Ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and
applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-
9010.78.1.98
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests.
Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of
human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne,
49(3), 182–185. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012801
Edwards, J. R. (2011). The Fallacy of formative measurement. Organizational
Research Methods, 14, 370-388
Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., y Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating
the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological re-search. Psychological Methods,
4(3), 272-299.
Ferrando, P. J. y Anguiano-Carrasco, C. (2010). El análisis factorial como técnica de
investigación en psicología. Papeles del Psicólogo, 31(1), 18-33.
Gallardo y Camacho. (2010). La motivación y el aprendizaje en educación.
Wanceulen Editorial
Kim, J. O. y Mueller, C. W. (1978). Factor analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
McGregor (2006). The Human Side of Enterprise. Annotated Edition. McGraw-Hill
Martínez, A. M. S. (2004). Tips Bioestadisticos. Ciencia UANL, 7(1), 121.
https://bit.ly/3ya6DWn
Navarro, N., Jiménez, E., Rappoport, S., & Thoeilliez, B. (2017). Fundamentos de la
investigación y la innovación educativa. La Rioja: Universidad Internacional de La Rioja
S.A
Palmero, Guerrero, Gómez. Carpi, Goyareb. (2011). Manual de teorías emocionales
y motivacionales. Universitat Jaume.
Peralbo, M., Sánchez, J. M., & Simón, M. A. (1986). Motivación y aprendizaje
escolar: Una aproximación desde la teoría de la autoeficacia. Infancia y aprendizaje, 9(35-
36), 37-45.
Pimienta Lastra, Rodrigo (2000). Encuestas probabilísticas vs. no probabilísticas.
Política y Cultura, (13),263-276. ISSN: 0188-7742. https://bit.ly/3IxqZ0b
Reidl Martínez, Lucy María. (2012). El diseño de investigación en educación:
conceptos actuales. Investigación en educación médica, 1(1), 35-39. https://bit.ly/31G8Gpd
Ryan, R., & Deci, E. L. (2000). La Teoría de la Autodeterminación y la Facilitación
de la Motivación Intrínseca, el Desarrollo Social, y el Bienestar. American Psychologist,
55(1), 68-78. https://bit.ly/3IqGQhj
Stover, Juliana Beatriz; Bruno, Flavia Paola; Uriel, Fabiana Edith; Fernandez
Liporace, Maria Mercedes. (2017). Teoría de la Autodeterminación: Una revisión teórica;
Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Psicología; Perspectivas en Psicología;
14; 2; 12-2017; 105-115 https://bit.ly/3y5avrs
Teixes Argilés, F. (2015). Gamificación: motivar jugando. Editorial UOC.
https://bit.ly/31CDWoF
Vallerand, R. J. (1997). Toward a hierachical model of intrinsic and extrinsic
motivation. Advances in Experimental and Social Psychology, 29, 271-360.
