VII. 360º APPROACH EVALUATION OF MAINTENANCE SERVICE PROVIDERS IN COMPANIES OF THE AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
The research was developed in a multinational company, leader in the design and development of automotive structures (chassis). The objective was to provide a solution to the problem presented, there was a lack of a method that would allow the evaluation of service providers. Maintenance service providers play an important role in improving the overall efficiency of an organization because they allow continuity in the operation of processes, thus avoiding costs due to downtime (Ardila et al, 2016). To solve it, it was necessary to analyze and design the instruments using a comprehensive 360º approach. The research had a qualitative approach and the type of design was the case study (Creswell, 2013). The techniques used were observation, in-depth interviews and focus groups. As a result, instruments were designed to evaluate the performance of service providers by the purchasing, maintenance and safety and hygiene areas and an instrument to evaluate the company itself by providers, as well as a concentrating table of the instruments, where it is visualized how the supplier performance evaluation is made up from the perspective of all the participants of the 360° process and a graph with its corresponding final rating. In the end, the validation was carried out by the area managers and the plant manager.
Download Statistics
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Evaluation of Suppliers, Comprehensive Evaluation, 360º Approach, Evaluation of Maintenance Services, Subcontracting of Maintenance Services
Laksono, M., Dana, P. & Suef, M. (2018). Performance model development for assessing maintenance service providers using the Kano model. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, 13(1). 225-231. DOI:10.24052/JBRMR/V13IS01/ART-22 Mendoza, M.A., Pimentel, A. B. & Ortiz M.R. (2015). Una Herramienta para Evaluar Proveedores de Mantenimiento de Equipo Médico. Un Caso de Estudio: Balanzas Analíticas. Memorias del congreso nacional de Ingeniería Biomédica. 208-211. Recuperado de: http://memorias.somib.org.mx/index.php/memorias/article/view/95 Murthy, D.N.P. & Jack, N. (2013). Extended Warranties, Maintenance Service and Lease Contracts. Springer Verlag: London. Murthy, D.N.P., Karim, M.R. & Ahmadi, A. (2015). Data management in maintenance outsourcing. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 142. 100-115 http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.05.002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.05.002 Osorio, J.C., Arango, D.C. & Ruales, C.E. (2011). Selección de proveedores usando el despliegue de la función de calidad difusa. Revista EIA, 15. 73 – 83 Escandón, Parra, C. A. & Osorio, J. C. (2019). Metodología multicriterio para la selección de proveedores bajo consideraciones de riesgo. Scientia et Technica, 24(02). 232 – 239. Peña, L.A. & Rodríguez, Y.L. (2018). Procedimiento de evaluación y selección de proveedores basado en el proceso de análisis jerárquico y en un modelo de programación lineal entera mixta. Ingeniería, 23(3). 230-251. https://doi.org/10.14483/23448393.13316. Sarache, W.A., Castrillón, O.D. & Ortíz, L.F. (2009). Selección de proveedores: una aproximación al estado del arte. Cuadernos de Administración, 22(38). 145-167. Recuperado de: https://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/cuadernos_admon/article/view/3868 Toossi, A., Lockett, H.L., Raja, J.Z. & Martinez, V. (2013). Assessing the Value Dimensions of Outsourced Maintenance Services. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 19(4). 348-363. https://doi.org/10.1108/JQME-04-2013-0021